Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › South Africa

Lawyers for Human Rights v. Minister of Home Affairs

Constitutional Court of South Africa · South Africa · 2017-06-29 · National court

Citation: [2017] ZACC 22
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May immigration officers detain a person for deportation without bringing them before a court?

What the court decided

No. Section 34 of the Immigration Act was unconstitutional because it did not require a detained person to be brought before a court within 48 hours.

In plain language

People held for deportation in South Africa could be kept for weeks without seeing a judge. The Constitutional Court said they must appear before a court within 48 hours.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Orang yang ditahan untuk dideportasi di Afrika Selatan bisa ditahan berminggu-minggu tanpa bertemu hakim. MK menyatakan mereka harus dihadapkan ke pengadilan dalam 48 jam.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah petugas imigrasi menahan seseorang untuk dideportasi tanpa membawanya ke pengadilan?

What happened afterwards

  • 2017-06-29: Section 34 declared invalid; interim rules set.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/za-lhr-2017/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.