Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › South Africa

Lawyers for Human Rights v. Minister of Home Affairs (detention at ports of entry)

Constitutional Court of South Africa · South Africa · 2004-03-09 · National court

Citation: [2004] ZACC 12
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Do people refused entry and held at ports or on ships have the same protection as other immigration detainees?

What the court decided

Yes. The safeguards of section 34(1), including review by a court, also apply to people held at ports of entry. [Check reasoning.]

In plain language

People stopped at South African airports and harbours could be held without the protections other detainees have. The Constitutional Court said the same protections apply to them.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Orang yang dihentikan di bandara dan pelabuhan Afrika Selatan bisa ditahan tanpa perlindungan yang dimiliki tahanan lain. MK menyatakan perlindungan yang sama berlaku bagi mereka.

Pertanyaan: Apakah orang yang ditolak masuk dan ditahan di pelabuhan atau kapal mendapat perlindungan yang sama dengan tahanan imigrasi lain?

What happened afterwards

  • 2004-03-09: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/za-lhr-2004/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.