Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Peru

Wong Ho Wing v. Peru

Inter-American Court of Human Rights · Peru · 2015-06-30 · Regional court or body

Citation: Series C No. 297
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided against the migrant side

Question

Would extraditing a Chinese national to face trial at home breach his right to life, and was his long detention lawful?

What the court decided

Extradition would not breach the Convention given diplomatic assurances; but his detention for over six years without proper review breached personal liberty.

In plain language

A Chinese businessman held in Peru fought extradition, fearing the death penalty. The Inter-American Court said Peru could extradite him, but had held him far too long.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Seorang pengusaha Tiongkok yang ditahan di Peru melawan ekstradisi karena takut hukuman mati. Mahkamah Inter-Amerika menyatakan Peru boleh mengekstradisi, tetapi menahannya terlalu lama.

Pertanyaan: Apakah mengekstradisi warga Tiongkok untuk diadili di negaranya melanggar hak hidupnya, dan apakah penahanannya yang lama sah?

What happened afterwards

  • 2015-06-30: Judgment.
  • 2016: Extradited to China. [Check.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/wong-ho-wing-2015/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.