Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Taiwan

J.Y. Interpretation No. 710 (deportation and detention of mainland Chinese residents)

Constitutional Court of Taiwan (Judicial Yuan) · Taiwan · 2013-07-05 · National court

Citation: J.Y. Interpretation No. 710
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Do people from mainland China facing removal from Taiwan have the same due-process protections as other foreigners?

What the court decided

Yes. Removal must allow a chance to be heard, and detention pending removal must be limited and subject to prompt judicial review.

In plain language

Following its decision on foreigners, the Constitutional Court said people from mainland China must also get a hearing before removal and a quick court check on any detention.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Mengikuti putusan tentang orang asing, MK menyatakan warga Tiongkok daratan juga harus didengar sebelum dikeluarkan dan penahanannya segera diperiksa pengadilan.

Pertanyaan: Apakah warga Tiongkok daratan yang akan dikeluarkan dari Taiwan mendapat perlindungan proses hukum yang sama dengan orang asing lain?

What happened afterwards

  • 2013-07-05: Interpretation issued.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/tw-jy-710-2013/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.