Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Taiwan

J.Y. Interpretation No. 708 (detention of foreigners pending deportation)

Constitutional Court of Taiwan (Judicial Yuan) · Taiwan · 2013-02-06 · National court

Citation: J.Y. Interpretation No. 708
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May immigration authorities hold a foreigner awaiting deportation without prompt review by a court?

What the court decided

No. Detention beyond the time needed to arrange removal requires a prompt and effective judicial remedy; the provision was to be amended within two years.

In plain language

Taiwan held foreigners, including migrant workers who had left their employers, in detention before deportation without a judge checking. The Constitutional Court said a court must be able to review such detention quickly.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Taiwan menahan orang asing, termasuk pekerja migran yang meninggalkan majikan, sebelum dideportasi tanpa pemeriksaan hakim. MK menyatakan pengadilan harus bisa segera meninjau penahanan itu.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah otoritas imigrasi menahan orang asing yang menunggu deportasi tanpa segera ditinjau pengadilan?

What happened afterwards

  • 2013-02-06: Interpretation issued.
  • 2015: Immigration Act amended to add court review of detention. [Check date.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/tw-jy-708-2013/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.