Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Bolivia

Pacheco Tineo Family v. Bolivia

Inter-American Court of Human Rights · Bolivia · 2013-11-25 · Regional court or body

Citation: Series C No. 272
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Did Bolivia breach the rights of a Peruvian family by expelling them within days without hearing their asylum claim?

What the court decided

Yes. Asylum and expulsion procedures require due process, and the family’s rights, including those of the children, were breached.

In plain language

A Peruvian family asked for asylum in Bolivia and were sent back to Peru within days. The Inter-American Court said Bolivia should have heard their claim properly.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Sebuah keluarga Peru meminta suaka di Bolivia dan dipulangkan ke Peru dalam hitungan hari. Mahkamah Inter-Amerika menyatakan Bolivia seharusnya memeriksa permohonan mereka dengan benar.

Pertanyaan: Apakah Bolivia melanggar hak keluarga asal Peru dengan mengusir mereka dalam hitungan hari tanpa mendengar permohonan suakanya?

What happened afterwards

  • 2001-02: Expulsion.
  • 2013-11-25: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/pacheco-tineo-2013/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.