Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Mexico

Random migration checks on roads (Amparo en revisión 275/2019)

Supreme Court of Justice of Mexico (First Chamber) · Mexico · 2022-05-18 · National court

Citation: AR 275/2019
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May immigration officers stop people on roads to check their migration status?

What the court decided

No. The migration review provisions breached freedom of movement and led to racial profiling, including of Mexican citizens.

In plain language

Three Indigenous Mexicans were pulled off a bus by immigration officers who assumed they were Guatemalan. The Supreme Court said random migration checks on roads are unconstitutional.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Tiga warga adat Meksiko diturunkan dari bus oleh petugas imigrasi yang mengira mereka warga Guatemala. MA menyatakan pemeriksaan imigrasi acak di jalan inkonstitusional.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah petugas imigrasi menghentikan orang di jalan untuk memeriksa status imigrasinya?

What happened afterwards

  • 2015: Detention of the three passengers.
  • 2022-05-18: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/mx-scjn-ar-275-2019/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.