Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Kuwait

Recruitment offices’ challenge to the Domestic Workers Law

Constitutional Court of Kuwait (as reported) · Kuwait · 2018-10 · National court

Citation: [case number to be added]
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Are the provisions making recruitment offices bear return costs and refunds under Law 68/2015 constitutional?

What the court decided

Yes, as reported. The court rejected the petition of ten recruitment offices against Articles 17 and 51.

In plain language

Ten domestic worker recruitment offices said the law was unfair to them because it made them send workers home and repay employers in some cases. The Constitutional Court rejected their challenge.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Sepuluh kantor perekrut pekerja rumah tangga berpendapat UU tidak adil karena mewajibkan mereka memulangkan pekerja dan mengembalikan uang majikan dalam kasus tertentu. MK menolak gugatan mereka.

Pertanyaan: Apakah ketentuan yang mewajibkan kantor perekrut menanggung biaya pemulangan dan pengembalian dana dalam UU 68/2015 konstitusional?

What happened afterwards

  • 2015: Domestic Workers Law No. 68 of 2015.
  • 2018-10: Petition rejected (reported). [Check year.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/kw-cc-offices-2018/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.