Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Kenya

Coalition for Reform and Democracy v. Republic of Kenya

High Court of Kenya · Kenya · 2015-02-23 · National court

Citation: Petition 628 of 2014
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Can a law cap the number of refugees in Kenya at 150,000?

What the court decided

No. The cap would force the return of refugees and was struck down with other parts of the security law.

In plain language

A security law said Kenya could host no more than 150,000 refugees, when far more already lived there. A five-judge bench of the High Court struck the cap down.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

UU keamanan menyatakan Kenya hanya boleh menampung paling banyak 150.000 pengungsi, padahal jauh lebih banyak yang sudah tinggal di sana. Majelis lima hakim Pengadilan Tinggi membatalkan batas itu.

Pertanyaan: Bisakah UU membatasi jumlah pengungsi di Kenya maksimal 150.000?

What happened afterwards

  • 2014-12: Security Laws (Amendment) Act passed.
  • 2015-02-23: Cap struck down.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/ke-cord-2015/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.