Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Japan

Permanent residents and public assistance

Supreme Court of Japan · Japan · 2014-07-18 · National court

Citation: Heisei 24 (Gyo-Hi) No. 45
Type of case: Administrative
Outcome: Decided against the migrant side

Question

Do foreign permanent residents have a legal right to public assistance under the Public Assistance Act?

What the court decided

No. The Act covers Japanese nationals; foreigners receive assistance only as an administrative measure, not as a legal entitlement.

In plain language

An elderly Chinese woman who had lived in Japan for decades was refused welfare. The Supreme Court said foreigners have no legal right to welfare, though the government may give it voluntarily.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Seorang perempuan lanjut usia asal Tiongkok yang tinggal puluhan tahun di Jepang ditolak bantuan sosial. MA menyatakan orang asing tidak punya hak hukum atas bantuan sosial, walau pemerintah boleh memberinya secara sukarela.

Pertanyaan: Apakah penduduk tetap asing punya hak hukum atas bantuan sosial menurut UU Bantuan Publik?

What happened afterwards

  • 2014-07-18: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/jp-welfare-2014/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.