Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Japan

Deportation right after an asylum refusal (Sri Lankan nationals)

Tokyo High Court · Japan · 2021-09-22 · National court

Citation: [case number to be added]
Type of case: Administrative
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May the state deport asylum seekers the day after telling them their objection was rejected, before they can go to court?

What the court decided

No. Removing them so quickly deprived them of the opportunity to sue and violated the constitutional right of access to the courts; damages were awarded.

In plain language

Two Sri Lankan men were told their asylum objection had failed and were put on a plane the next day. The Tokyo High Court said this denied them their right to go to court.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Dua pria Sri Lanka diberi tahu keberatan suaka mereka gagal dan diterbangkan keesokan harinya. Pengadilan Tinggi Tokyo menyatakan ini menghilangkan hak mereka untuk ke pengadilan.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah negara mendeportasi pencari suaka sehari setelah memberi tahu keberatannya ditolak, sebelum mereka bisa ke pengadilan?

What happened afterwards

  • 2014-12: Deportation.
  • 2021-09-22: Judgment for the men.
  • 2021-10: The state does not appeal. [Check.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/jp-tokyo-hc-2021/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.