Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › India

People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (Asiad workers)

Supreme Court of India · India · 1982-09-18 · National court

Citation: (1982) 3 SCC 235
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Were migrant construction workers building the 1982 Asian Games venues entitled to the minimum wage and other labour protections?

What the court decided

Yes. Paying less than the minimum wage is forced labour under Article 23; the State must enforce labour laws against contractors.

In plain language

Workers from other states built stadiums in Delhi for the Asian Games and were paid less than the legal minimum. The Supreme Court said paying below the minimum wage is a form of forced labour.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Pekerja dari negara bagian lain membangun stadion di Delhi untuk Asian Games dan dibayar di bawah upah minimum. MA menyatakan membayar di bawah upah minimum adalah bentuk kerja paksa.

Pertanyaan: Apakah pekerja bangunan migran yang membangun arena Asian Games 1982 berhak atas upah minimum dan perlindungan lain?

What happened afterwards

  • 1982-09-18: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/in-asiad-1982/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.