Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Spain

Case No. 2121 (Spain): trade union rights of migrants without residence

ILO Committee on Freedom of Association · Spain · 2002 · International body

Citation: Case No. 2121 [report number to be added]
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May a law make the right to join a union depend on the worker having legal residence?

What the court decided

No. Freedom of association belongs to all workers without distinction, including those in an irregular situation; the Committee asked Spain to amend its Aliens Act.

In plain language

A Spanish law said migrants without legal residence could not join unions. The ILO’s freedom of association committee said every worker, with or without papers, may join a union, and asked Spain to change the law. Spain’s Constitutional Court later struck the rule down.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Sebuah UU Spanyol menyatakan migran tanpa izin tinggal tidak boleh bergabung dengan serikat. Komite Kebebasan Berserikat ILO menyatakan setiap pekerja, berdokumen atau tidak, boleh bergabung dengan serikat, dan meminta Spanyol mengubah UU itu. MK Spanyol kemudian membatalkan aturan tersebut.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah undang-undang mensyaratkan izin tinggal yang sah untuk hak bergabung dengan serikat pekerja?

What happened afterwards

  • 2001: Complaint by Spanish unions.
  • 2002: Committee calls for amendment.
  • 2007-11-07: Spanish Constitutional Court strikes down the residence requirement (STC 236/2007).

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/ilo-cfa-2121/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.