Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Israel

Kav LaOved v. Ministry of Interior (pregnancy procedure)

Supreme Court of Israel (sitting as High Court of Justice) · Israel · 2011-04-12 · National court

Citation: HCJ 11437/05
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May a migrant worker lose her permit and be required to leave because she gives birth?

What the court decided

No. The procedure that forced migrant workers who gave birth to leave with the baby, or send the baby abroad, disproportionately harmed the right to parenthood and was struck down.

In plain language

Israel’s rules said a migrant worker who had a baby had to leave the country or send the baby away. The Supreme Court said this rule was unlawful and cancelled it.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Aturan Israel mewajibkan pekerja migran yang melahirkan meninggalkan negara itu atau mengirim bayinya keluar. MA menyatakan aturan itu tidak sah dan membatalkannya.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah pekerja migran kehilangan izin dan wajib pergi karena melahirkan?

What happened afterwards

  • 2011-04-12: Procedure struck down.
  • 2011: A revised procedure keeps limits on staying with the child. [Check.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/il-pregnancy-2011/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.