Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Israel

Desta v. Knesset (length of stay at Holot)

Supreme Court of Israel (sitting as High Court of Justice) · Israel · 2015-08-11 · National court

Citation: HCJ 8665/14
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Is a 20-month stay at the Holot facility proportionate?

What the court decided

No. The court upheld the facility but held 20 months excessive and set 12 months as the limit until the law was amended.

In plain language

The third law allowed people to be held at Holot for 20 months. The Supreme Court allowed the facility but said 20 months was too long. Hundreds of people were released.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

UU ketiga membolehkan orang ditahan di Holot selama 20 bulan. MA membolehkan fasilitas itu tetapi menyatakan 20 bulan terlalu lama. Ratusan orang dibebaskan.

Pertanyaan: Apakah tinggal 20 bulan di fasilitas Holot proporsional?

What happened afterwards

  • 2015-08: About 1,200 people released. [Check number.]
  • 2018: Holot closed.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/il-desta-2015/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.