Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Canada
Toussaint v. Canada
UN Human Rights Committee · Canada · 2018-07-24 · International body
Citation: CCPR/C/123/D/2348/2014
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side
Question
Did excluding an irregular migrant from federal health coverage breach her right to life?
What the court decided
Yes. Denying coverage where her life was at risk breached the rights to life and to non-discrimination.
In plain language
A woman from Grenada living in Canada without status was refused health coverage when she was seriously ill. The UN Human Rights Committee said this put her life at risk and broke the treaty.
Dalam bahasa sederhana
Seorang perempuan dari Grenada yang tinggal di Kanada tanpa status ditolak jaminan kesehatan saat sakit parah. Komite HAM PBB menyatakan ini membahayakan nyawanya dan melanggar perjanjian.
Pertanyaan: Apakah mengecualikan migran tanpa dokumen dari jaminan kesehatan federal melanggar hak hidupnya?
What happened afterwards
- 2018-07-24: Views adopted.
Sources
Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).
Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/hrc-toussaint-2018/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.
