Migration Jurisprudence from the South › United Kingdom
Hounga v. Allen
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom · United Kingdom · 2014-07-30 · National court
Citation: [2014] UKSC 47
Type of case: Private
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side
Question
Does working illegally bar a trafficked domestic worker from claiming discrimination in her dismissal?
What the court decided
No. Public policy against trafficking and in favour of protecting its victims outweighs the illegality defence.
In plain language
A young woman from Nigeria was brought to the UK on false papers to work in a family home, abused and then thrown out. The employer said she could not sue because her work was illegal. The Supreme Court said she could.
Dalam bahasa sederhana
Seorang perempuan muda dari Nigeria dibawa ke Inggris dengan dokumen palsu untuk bekerja di rumah keluarga, dianiaya lalu diusir. Majikan berkata ia tidak bisa menggugat karena pekerjaannya ilegal. Mahkamah Agung menyatakan ia boleh menggugat.
Pertanyaan: Apakah bekerja secara ilegal menghalangi pekerja rumah tangga korban perdagangan orang untuk menggugat diskriminasi atas pemecatannya?
What happened afterwards
- 2014-07-30: Tribunal award for discriminatory dismissal restored.
Sources
Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).
Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/hounga-2014/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.
