Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Hong Kong

Ghulam Rbani v. Secretary for Justice

Court of Final Appeal, Hong Kong · Hong Kong · 2014-03-14 · National court

Citation: [2014] HKCFA 20 (FACV 15/2013)
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Was the immigration detention of a Pakistani man lawful when officers did not consider whether it was needed?

What the court decided

No. Detention requires an actual decision applying the published policy; without it, part of the detention was unlawful and damages were due.

In plain language

A Pakistani man was held for weeks by Hong Kong immigration officers without anyone deciding whether he needed to be held. The top court said that part of his detention was unlawful.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Seorang pria Pakistan ditahan berminggu-minggu oleh petugas imigrasi Hong Kong tanpa ada yang memutuskan apakah ia perlu ditahan. Pengadilan tertinggi menyatakan sebagian penahanan itu tidak sah.

Pertanyaan: Apakah penahanan imigrasi seorang pria Pakistan sah ketika petugas tidak menimbang perlunya penahanan?

What happened afterwards

  • 2014-03-14: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/hk-rbani-2014/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.