Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Hong Kong

Ng Ka Ling v. Director of Immigration

Court of Final Appeal, Hong Kong · Hong Kong · 1999-01-29 · National court

Citation: FACV 14/1998
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Do children born in mainland China to Hong Kong permanent residents have the right of abode, without first getting an exit permit?

What the court decided

Yes. The right of abode in the Basic Law could not be made subject to a one-way permit scheme or limited to children born after a parent became a resident.

In plain language

Thousands of children in mainland China had a parent living in Hong Kong. The top court said they had the right to live in Hong Kong. Months later, an interpretation by China’s legislature limited the effect of the ruling.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Ribuan anak di Tiongkok daratan punya orang tua yang tinggal di Hong Kong. Pengadilan tertinggi menyatakan mereka berhak tinggal di Hong Kong. Beberapa bulan kemudian, tafsir badan legislatif Tiongkok membatasi akibat putusan itu.

Pertanyaan: Apakah anak yang lahir di Tiongkok daratan dari penduduk tetap Hong Kong punya hak tinggal, tanpa harus mendapat izin keluar dulu?

What happened afterwards

  • 1999-01-29: Judgment.
  • 1999-06-26: Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress interprets the Basic Law.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/hk-ng-ka-ling-1999/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.