Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Slovenia

Kurić v. Slovenia (Grand Chamber)

European Court of Human Rights · Slovenia · 2012-06-26 · Regional court or body

Citation: App. no. 26828/06
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Did Slovenia breach the rights of people from other former Yugoslav republics whose residence was erased after independence?

What the court decided

Yes. The “erasure” breached private and family life and equality, and the state had to set up a compensation scheme.

In plain language

In 1992 more than 25,000 long-term residents of Slovenia from other Yugoslav republics were wiped from the residence register and lost their jobs and rights. The Grand Chamber said Slovenia must compensate them.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Pada 1992 lebih dari 25.000 penduduk lama Slovenia dari republik Yugoslavia lain dihapus dari daftar penduduk dan kehilangan pekerjaan serta hak. Majelis Agung menyatakan Slovenia wajib memberi ganti rugi.

Pertanyaan: Apakah Slovenia melanggar hak orang dari bekas republik Yugoslavia lain yang izin tinggalnya dihapus setelah kemerdekaan?

What happened afterwards

  • 1992-02: Erasure.
  • 2012-06-26: Pilot judgment.
  • 2014: Compensation act adopted.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/echr-kuric-2012/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.