Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Netherlands

Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (Grand Chamber)

European Court of Human Rights · Netherlands · 2014-10-03 · Regional court or body

Citation: App. no. 12738/10
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Must a mother without residence status be allowed to stay with her children who are citizens?

What the court decided

Yes, in the circumstances. Refusing her residence failed to give enough weight to the best interests of the children.

In plain language

A woman from Suriname had lived in the Netherlands for 16 years with her Dutch husband and children but had no residence permit. The Grand Chamber said refusing her one breached family life.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Seorang perempuan dari Suriname tinggal 16 tahun di Belanda bersama suami dan anak-anaknya yang warga Belanda tetapi tidak punya izin tinggal. Majelis Agung menyatakan penolakan izin melanggar hak keluarga.

Pertanyaan: Haruskah ibu tanpa izin tinggal diizinkan tinggal bersama anak-anaknya yang warga negara?

What happened afterwards

  • 2014-10-03: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/echr-jeunesse-2014/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.