Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Austria

Gaygusuz v. Austria

European Court of Human Rights · Austria · 1996-09-16 · Regional court or body

Citation: App. no. 17371/90
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May a state refuse emergency unemployment assistance to a foreign worker who paid contributions, because of his nationality?

What the court decided

No. Only very weighty reasons could justify a difference based on nationality; the refusal breached Article 14 with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

In plain language

A Turkish worker in Austria who had paid into the system was refused emergency benefits because he was not Austrian. The European Court said this was discrimination.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Seorang pekerja Turki di Austria yang sudah membayar iuran ditolak tunjangan darurat karena bukan warga Austria. Mahkamah Eropa menyatakan ini diskriminasi.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah negara menolak bantuan darurat pengangguran bagi pekerja asing yang sudah membayar iuran, karena kewarganegaraannya?

What happened afterwards

  • 1996-09-16: Judgment.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/echr-gaygusuz-1996/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.