Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Canada

Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

Supreme Court of Canada · Canada · 2007-02-23 · National court

Citation: 2007 SCC 9
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Is detention of non-citizens under security certificates, based on secret evidence, constitutional?

What the court decided

No, as designed. The procedure denied a fair hearing, and foreign nationals had to get the same prompt detention review as permanent residents.

In plain language

Non-citizens were held for years on secret evidence they could not see. The Supreme Court struck down the procedure and required prompt reviews of detention.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Bukan warga negara ditahan bertahun-tahun berdasarkan bukti rahasia yang tidak bisa mereka lihat. MA membatalkan prosedur itu dan mewajibkan peninjauan penahanan yang cepat.

Pertanyaan: Apakah penahanan bukan warga negara berdasarkan sertifikat keamanan, dengan bukti rahasia, konstitusional?

What happened afterwards

  • 2007-02-23: Judgment, suspended for a year.
  • 2008: Special advocates introduced by statute.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/ca-charkaoui-2007/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.