Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › South Africa

Lawyers for Human Rights v. Minister of Home Affairs and Another

High Court of South Africa North Gauteng, Pretoria · South Africa · 2025-05-07 · National court

Citation: 14238/21; [2025] ZAGPPHC 1766
Type of case: Administrative
Outcome: Outcome to be confirmed

Unchecked candidate. This decision has been located in an official or free law database but has not yet been read and written up. The summary below describes the subject only.

Subject

Detention of foreign nationals beyond permitted periods (Lawyers for Human Rights).

Pokok perkara

Penahanan warga asing melebihi jangka waktu yang diizinkan (Lawyers for Human Rights).

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/c-h-za-lawyers-for-human-rights-2025/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.