Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Brazil

Workers of the Hacienda Brasil Verde v. Brazil

Inter-American Court of Human Rights · Brazil · 2016-10-20 · Regional court or body

Citation: Series C No. 318
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Was Brazil responsible for slavery on a ranch where workers recruited from poorer states were held by debt?

What the court decided

Yes. Brazil failed to prevent slavery and to investigate and punish it; the Court found structural discrimination based on economic position.

In plain language

Men recruited from poor regions of Brazil were taken to a remote ranch and kept working by debt and threats. It was the Inter-American Court’s first judgment on slavery, and it found Brazil responsible.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Pria yang direkrut dari wilayah miskin Brasil dibawa ke peternakan terpencil dan dipaksa bekerja dengan utang dan ancaman. Ini putusan pertama Mahkamah Inter-Amerika tentang perbudakan, dan Brasil dinyatakan bertanggung jawab.

Pertanyaan: Apakah Brasil bertanggung jawab atas perbudakan di peternakan tempat pekerja dari negara bagian miskin dijerat utang?

What happened afterwards

  • 2000-03: Workers rescued after inspection.
  • 2016-10-20: Judgment.
  • 2019: Court supervision of compliance continues. [Check.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/brasil-verde-2016/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.