Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Brazil

The “dirty list” of employers using slave labour (ADPF 509)

Supreme Federal Court of Brazil · Brazil · 2020-09 · National court

Citation: ADPF 509
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

May the government publish a list of employers found using labour analogous to slavery?

What the court decided

Yes. The register is constitutional; it is a transparency measure based on administrative findings after due process.

In plain language

Brazil publishes the names of employers found using slave-like labour, including of migrant workers in garment workshops. An employers’ association challenged the list, and the Supreme Court upheld it.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Brasil menerbitkan nama majikan yang terbukti memakai kerja mirip perbudakan, termasuk pekerja migran di bengkel garmen. Asosiasi pengusaha menggugat daftar itu, dan MA Federal mempertahankannya.

Pertanyaan: Bolehkah pemerintah menerbitkan daftar majikan yang terbukti memakai kerja yang setara perbudakan?

What happened afterwards

  • 2020-09: List upheld. [Check exact date.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/br-stf-adpf-509-2020/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.