Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Bangladesh

Writ on Bangladeshi workers who died on World Cup projects

High Court Division, Supreme Court of Bangladesh · Bangladesh · 2023-01-30 · National court

Citation: [writ petition number to be added]
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: advisory

Question

Must the government list Bangladeshi workers who died or were injured on construction projects abroad, and consider compensation for families?

What the court decided

The court directed the ministries to compile the list within a month and asked them to show cause why compensation should not be ordered; the Appellate Division chamber judge stayed the list directive until March 2023.

In plain language

A lawyer asked Bangladesh’s High Court to make the government account for workers who died or were hurt building stadiums abroad. The court ordered a list and asked about compensation. A higher judge paused part of the order.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Seorang advokat meminta Pengadilan Tinggi Bangladesh mewajibkan pemerintah mendata pekerja yang meninggal atau cedera saat membangun stadion di luar negeri. Pengadilan memerintahkan pendataan dan menanyakan ganti rugi. Hakim yang lebih tinggi menangguhkan sebagian perintah itu.

Pertanyaan: Wajibkah pemerintah mendata pekerja Bangladesh yang meninggal atau cedera di proyek konstruksi di luar negeri, dan mempertimbangkan ganti rugi bagi keluarga?

What happened afterwards

  • 2022-12: Writ filed.
  • 2023-01-30: List ordered; rule issued on compensation.
  • 2023-02: Chamber judge stays the list directive until 6 March. [Later course to check.]

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/bd-hc-qatar-2023/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.