Institute for Migrant Rights
Railway line at Cianjur station, c. 1890 · KITLV, CC BY 4.0

Migration Jurisprudence from the South › Angola

Union Inter-Africaine des Droits de l’Homme v. Angola

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights · Angola · 1997-11 · Regional court or body

Citation: Communication 159/96
Type of case: Constitutional and human rights
Outcome: Decided for the migrant side

Question

Was Angola’s round-up and expulsion of West African workers lawful?

What the court decided

No. Mass expulsion of non-nationals is a special violation of human rights; the expelled lost their property and work.

In plain language

Angola arrested and expelled hundreds of people from West Africa, many working in diamond areas, without any court process. The African Commission said mass expulsion is forbidden.

Dalam bahasa sederhana

Angola menangkap dan mengusir ratusan orang dari Afrika Barat, banyak yang bekerja di kawasan berlian, tanpa proses pengadilan. Komisi Afrika menyatakan pengusiran massal dilarang.

Pertanyaan: Apakah penangkapan dan pengusiran pekerja Afrika Barat oleh Angola sah?

What happened afterwards

  • 1996: Expulsions carried out.
  • 1997-11: Decision adopted.

Sources

Open this decision in the interactive collection (compare, filter, Indonesian view, downloads).

Cite as: Institute for Migrant Rights (2026), Migration Jurisprudence from the South, version 0.1, https://theimr.org/court-decisions/d/achpr-uiadh-1997/. This page summarizes a court decision for research and advocacy; it is not legal advice.

For researchers

This collection of decisions is built for empirical legal scholarship and socio-legal research on migration and the rights of migrant workers, as well as for advocacy.

The coded variables support statistical analysis in law: cross-national comparison, regression and event-history designs, and law and economics questions such as how recruitment fees, wage protection and limits on changing employer affect migrant workers. The data can be downloaded for replication.

Keywords: case law; jurisprudence; judicial decisions; comparative constitutional law; courts and migration; judicial behavior; litigation outcomes; refugee law; non-refoulement; citizenship and nationality; empirical legal studies; empirical legal scholarship; quantitative legal research; statistical analysis in law; law and economics; law and economics of migration; comparative law; socio-legal studies; legal pluralism; migration law; labor migration; migrant workers’ rights; human rights law; access to justice; Global South; Asia; Africa; Middle East; Latin America; Indonesia; open data; replication data.